If you consult the Animal Control Consolidation (by-law #1979) in conjunction with the zoning map of the City of Powell River, you can figure out whether you are allowed to keep animals on your property other than dogs or cats. Here’s how it works:
Go to page 4 of the Animal Control Consolidation. Clause 29 states:
29. No person shall keep any animal, other than a dog or cat, on a parcel of land in the District unless the land is in an area zoned RA1, A1 or A2 under the Powell River Zoning Bylaw No. 1851, 1999 except in the lawful operation of a pet shop or veterinary clinic.
There are no exceptions to this clause. So look at the zoning map. If you are not in an area zoned RA1 (Residential Agricultural), A1 (Small Lot Rural Residential), or A2 (Small Lot Rural), then you are out of luck. You’ll have to raise small animals on the QT. These zones cover all of Wildwood, except for Catalyst’s landfill; most of the parts of Cranberry lying to the south, east, and north of Cranberry Lake; and a few areas on the edge of Westview as well as the lands surrounding the hydro right-of-way.
Let’s say that you do happen to live in an area zoned RA1, A1, or A2. Clause 30 of the Animal Control Consolidation states:
30. No person shall keep any animal, other than a dog or cat in the District unless:
a) 0.4 hectares (1 acre) of land is provided for the animal, and
b) an additional 0.2 hectares (0.5 acres) of land is provided for each additional animal.
c) Notwithstanding sections 30 (a) and (b) of this bylaw, a person may keep any animal, other than a dog or cat on a parcel of land in the District in an area zoned Residential Agricultural (RA1), under the Powell River Zoning Bylaw No. 1851, 1999 provided that:
(i) 0.2 hectares (0.5 acres) of land is provided for each animal.
So now we learn that in order to keep any animal other than a dog or cat, you need to be in an area zoned RA1, A1, or A2; and you must also provide an acre of land for the first such animal (clause 30(a)) and a half-acre for each subsequent animal (clause 30(b)).
Clause 30(c) informs us that if you are in area zoned RA1, however, you only need a half-acre for each animal, not a full acre for the first animal and a half-acre for the subsequent ones. (So zone RA1 is clearly the gold standard of urban agricultural zones.)
Now we get to clauses 31 and 32:
32. Notwithstanding section 30 of this bylaw, a person may keep up to 24 poultry, one of which may be a rooster, or 50 rabbits on a parcel of land in the District having an area greater than 0.2 hectares (0.5 acres).
31. Notwithstanding section 30 of this bylaw, a person may keep up to 12 poultry, none of which may be a rooster, or 20 rabbits on a parcel of land in the District having an area of 0.2 hectares (0.5 acres) or less.
Upshot of these two clauses: the business we just went through about needing an acre for the first animal and so on does not count if we are talking about poultry or rabbits. In the case of poultry or rabbits, you need to be an area zoned RA1, A1, or A2, as always; but if your property is half an acre or smaller in size then you can keep “up to 12 poultry, none of which may be a rooster, or 20 rabbits”. If your property is larger than half an acre then you can keep “up to 24 poultry, one of which may be a rooster, or 50 rabbits”.
It seems that the by-law is written so that poultry and rabbits are mutually exclusive. At any rate, there is no simple way of figuring out of you can keep some mix of poultry and rabbits, and if so how many poultry equals one rabbit.
So, in the interests of simplifying this, here is the decision tree:
1. Do you live in an area zoned RA1, A1, or A2? (Consult the map.) If yes, go to (2). If no, you cannot legally keep livestock in the City of Powell River. Go to (7).
2. Is your property half an acre or less in size? If yes, go to (3). If no, go to (4).
3. You may keep up to 12 poultry, none of which may be a rooster, or 20 rabbits. If your property is in an area zoned RA1, and it is precisely half an acre in size, then you can keep one other animal other than a dog, cat, poultry, or rabbit. Go to (7).
4. You may keep up to 24 poultry, one of which may be a rooster, or 50 rabbits. Is your property in an area zoned RA1? If so, go to (5). If not, go to (6).
5. You can keep animals other than a dog, cat, poultry, or rabbit, as long as you provide a half an acre per animal. Go to (7).
6. You can keep animals other than a dog, cat, poultry, or rabbit, as long as you provide an acre for the first such animal and a half an acre for each subsequent animal. Go to (7).
7. Confused? If yes, then go back to (1) and try again. If not, you’re done.
So, it’s a little complicated, but not terribly so.
The upshot is that there are large parts of the City of Powell River where livestock are illegal. This needs to be investigated and changed if needed. Who wants to help with that?



7 comments
Comments feed for this article
January 1, 2009 at 5:51 pm
Mike Hertz
I live in Sechelt, and I’m working on a project to permit a limited number of chickens at residences within the city. Tentatively, this would be 5 chickens (no roosters), which would have to be kept indoors, within a prescribed distance away from neighbours. I found an interesting website which purports to list many of the municipalities with laws on the subject of chickens being raised.
January 5, 2009 at 12:16 pm
David
Thanks, Mike. Please keep us up to date on your efforts down your way. There have been rumblings about mounting an effort to challenge/change the bylaws here in Powell River, but so far no one has stepped forward to champion it. Maybe in 2009…
June 27, 2010 at 9:23 am
amber
Thank you!! This is all very VERY helpful. I live in Westview and want to have chickens to lay eggs, to teach the children…If are area is not in an area where we can, i will go to city hall, maybe start a petition? It makes sense. Its for sustinable living. Its the way the worlds is going
Thank you!
June 27, 2010 at 11:26 am
David Parkinson
Looks like the by-laws might be about to change… stay tuned.
July 25, 2010 at 8:41 pm
Lizzie
I’m interested in working on this, and have already gotten a little involved with the move to change the bylaw with regards to chickens. Do please count me in.
Out of interest, this law seems to ban EVERYTHING, including pet goldfish! I work at Mother Nature, and we’re certainly not asking people about their zoning when we sell them guppies or hamsters. I think that rabbits or hens are likely far less annoying to live near than many dogs, and I don’t see why they should banned. If Vancouver can have chickens, so should we.
Thank you for the detailed and useful article.
July 26, 2010 at 8:50 am
David Parkinson
Thanks for reading! It’ll be interesting to see how this urban livestock thing plays out. Agreed about the dogs.
May 3, 2011 at 12:37 pm
Proposed amendments to Powell River’s Animal Control Bylaw « Powell River Food Security Project
[...] an earlier post, I laid out my best understanding of Powell River’s somewhat complicated Animal Control Bylaw [...]